December 9, 2025

University of Oklahoma Instructors Placed on Administrative Leave

News Summary

The University of Oklahoma is facing scrutiny after placing two instructors on administrative leave due to allegations of viewpoint discrimination. A psychology student claimed bias in grading practices for referencing religious beliefs in an assignment. This situation has ignited debates about academic freedom and the responsibilities of educational institutions to allow diverse perspectives. The university has committed to investigating the matter thoroughly while ensuring compliance with academic standards and First Amendment rights.

Oklahoma City, OK – The University of Oklahoma is currently facing scrutiny following the administrative leave of two instructors amid allegations of viewpoint discrimination from a student. A junior psychology major, Samantha Fulnecky, filed a complaint against graduate instructor Mel Curth, questioning grading practices that she claims were biased against her religious beliefs. The incident has sparked discussions about academic freedom and the responsibility of educational institutions to foster an environment where diverse perspectives can be expressed and debated.

The controversy began when Fulnecky received a zero on a psychology assignment in which she referenced the Bible to argue against the concept of multiple genders. Curth criticized the paper for its lack of empirical evidence, suggesting that it was offensive. Following the grading, Fulnecky took formal action, leading to the university placing Curth on administrative leave as they investigate the matter. A related incident involved Kelli Alvarez, an assistant teaching professor, who was also placed on leave for allegedly encouraging students to attend a protest supporting Curth while not offering the same privilege to students with opposing views.

The University of Oklahoma has emphasized its dedication to upholding academic standards, ensuring fairness, and protecting First Amendment rights. As the investigations unfold, university officials are keen to reassure students and the community that every individual’s right to express their sincerely held beliefs is respected within the academic framework.

Background of the Incident

The administrative leave stems from an assignment given in a psychology course focused on lifespan development. In this course, students were tasked with analyzing a study regarding gender norms. Fulnecky’s submission included her religious perspectives, asserting that ideas promoting multiple genders were “demonic” and harmful. The instructor’s assessment of the assignment, which resulted in the low grade, has been interpreted as an act of viewpoint discrimination by the student.

Institutional Response

The university administration took immediate action in response to the allegations. Investigations into both instructors are currently underway, aimed at ensuring compliance with academic standards and addressing any issues related to freedom of expression in the classroom. Officials have noted that it is critical for the institution to maintain a neutral environment in which all viewpoints can be expressed respectfully and without bias.

Diverse Perspectives and Academic Freedom

This case highlights an ongoing debate about academic freedom and the balance between maintaining academic rigor and supporting a diversity of perspectives in educational settings. The university’s actions reflect a broader commitment to fostering a robust academic environment where students are encouraged to engage critically with varied viewpoints while respecting the rights of others to articulate their beliefs and convictions.

Impact on the Student Community

Fulnecky’s case has prompted discussions among students and faculty regarding the implications of responding to controversial topics within academic settings. The events have led many within the community to consider the importance of preparing students to engage in thoughtful debate while understanding the significance of their own viewpoints in a diverse academic landscape.

Next Steps for the University

As the investigations proceed, the University of Oklahoma will have an opportunity to reaffirm its commitment to both academic freedom and the principles that guide a respectful and inclusive educational experience. The outcomes of this situation may also set important precedents regarding how similar cases are handled in the future.

Conclusion

The unfolding events stemming from these allegations serve as a reminder of the complexities involved in higher education. As the University of Oklahoma navigates through this issue, it highlights the importance of maintaining a balance between upholding academic standards and respecting the diverse ideologies of students. The university community and the wider public are encouraged to engage with these discussions and remain informed about developments in this significant matter.

Feature	Details
Instructors Involved	Mel Curth and Kelli Alvarez
Student Involved	Samantha Fulnecky
Allegation	Viewpoint discrimination
Action Taken	Administrative leave for both instructors
University’s Response	Initiated investigations; emphasized commitment to fairness and First Amendment rights

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What led to the administrative leave of the University of Oklahoma instructors?

The administrative leave of instructors Mel Curth and Kelli Alvarez was prompted by allegations of viewpoint discrimination. Curth was placed on leave after a student, Samantha Fulnecky, filed a religious discrimination complaint concerning her grading practices. Alvarez was placed on leave for allegedly encouraging students to miss class to attend a protest supporting Curth, while not offering the same to those wishing to express a counter-viewpoint.

What was the nature of the assignment that led to the controversy?

The assignment was part of a psychology course on lifespan development, where students were asked to analyze a study on gender norms and middle school social dynamics. Samantha Fulnecky cited the Bible in her essay to argue against the concept of multiple genders, stating that promoting such beliefs was “demonic” and harmful to society.

What actions has the University of Oklahoma taken in response to these incidents?

The University of Oklahoma has initiated investigations into both cases to ensure adherence to academic standards and the protection of First Amendment rights. The administration has emphasized its commitment to fairness, respect, and the protection of every student’s right to express sincerely held beliefs.