December 23, 2025

University of Oklahoma Dismisses Graduate Assistant Over Grading Dispute

News Summary

A graduate teaching assistant at the University of Oklahoma was dismissed following a grading dispute involving a student’s essay that included biblical references. The university’s review found the grading practices to be arbitrary and biased against the student’s religious beliefs. This incident has ignited discussions on academic freedom and the intersection of religion and gender identity in educational settings. OU affirmed its commitment to fair grading and essential academic freedoms.

Oklahoma City, OK – A significant incident at the University of Oklahoma (OU) has sparked national conversations surrounding academic freedom and religious discrimination after the dismissal of a graduate teaching assistant. The case involves a grading dispute over a student’s essay that cited the Bible, revealing how contentious discussions around topics of gender and beliefs can intersect within academia. This incident not only highlights the importance of objective grading criteria but also underlines the university’s commitment to maintaining an environment for learning that is both equitable and grounded in academic integrity.

The conflict began in November 2025 when Samantha Fulnecky, a graduate student at OU, submitted a psychology essay critically analyzing concepts of gender roles. Fulnecky expressed views against the idea of multiple genders and included biblical references to support her assertions. Her instructor, Mel Curth, who identifies as transgender, deemed the essay offensive and failing to meet the assignment guidelines, resulting in a zero being awarded. Fulnecky contended that the grading was influenced by discrimination against her religious views, prompting her to file a complaint and call for a review of the incident.

This review concluded with the university affirming that Curth’s grading practices were arbitrary, leading to her removal from teaching responsibilities. OU emphasized that the decision was rooted in ensuring academic fairness and protecting students’ rights to express their beliefs without fear of bias in evaluation.

Understanding the Grading Dispute

The underlying issue of the dismissal revolves around a 650-word essay Fulnecky submitted, which argued against the acceptance of multiple gender identities—her perspective largely drawn from her interpretation of biblical texts. Curth’s response was that the essay lacked a rigorous empirical argument, focusing instead on Fulnecky’s personal beliefs and use of inflammatory language.

University’s Review Process

Upon receiving Fulnecky’s complaint, the University of Oklahoma initiated a comprehensive review involving an assessment of Curth’s grading history and methodologies. The inquiry scrutinized whether the grading was consistent with established academic standards. The university’s findings determined that Curth’s actions did not adhere to objective grading practices, resulting in her dismissal.

Impact on Student’s Academic Record

A key aspect of the university’s findings was its commitment to ensuring that Fulnecky’s academic progress would not be adversely affected by the incident. The institution confirmed that her final grade would not include the zero from the contested essay, pledging support for students’ rights and their academic pursuits.

Ongoing Discussions and Reactions

This incident has catalyzed broader discussions on the interactions between religious belief, gender identity, and academic assessment. Stakeholders within the university and the wider community are debating the implications of the case for future educational practices. The university remains dedicated to reviewing its protocols to ensure a fair assessment environment for all students, as well as equipping instructors with the necessary tools to maintain objectivity without restricting academic discourse.

Future Implications for Academic Freedom

The university’s response and subsequent actions reflect its broader mission to uphold academic freedom, promote an inclusive educational atmosphere, and ensure that all students can engage in intellectual discourse. However, the case reiterates the complex balance universities must strike in fostering an environment where diverse viewpoints can coexist while maintaining rigorous academic standards.

Conclusion

This case not only spotlights the intricate nature of grading within educational institutions but also emphasizes the necessity for ongoing conversations regarding academic policy, institutional response to student grievances, and the preservation of educational integrity. As Oklahoma City continues to shape its higher education landscape, the University of Oklahoma’s actions demonstrate a commitment to advancing these ideals while fostering an open academic environment.

Feature	Description
Location	Oklahoma City, OK
University Involved	University of Oklahoma
Instructor Dismissed	Mel Curth
Student Involved	Samantha Fulnecky
Course	Psychology
Assignment Type	650-word essay
Issue	Grading dispute over essay citing the Bible
University’s Action	Dismissal of instructor after investigation
Student’s Action	Filed religious discrimination complaint
Outcome for Student	No academic harm; final grade unaffected

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What was the reason for the graduate teaching assistant’s dismissal?

The University of Oklahoma dismissed the graduate teaching assistant, Mel Curth, after an investigation determined that her grading of a student’s essay was arbitrary. The review examined Curth’s grading standards, past grading patterns, and statements related to the incident, leading to her removal from instructional duties.

What was the content of the student’s essay that led to the dispute?

The student’s essay, written by Samantha Fulnecky, analyzed an article on gender roles. In her essay, Fulnecky rejected the concept of multiple genders and cited the Bible to support her views, stating that society’s acceptance of multiple genders was “demonic” and harmful to youth.

What actions did the student take following the grading dispute?

Following the grading dispute, Samantha Fulnecky filed a religious discrimination complaint with the University of Oklahoma. The university initiated a full review of the situation, which led to the dismissal of the graduate teaching assistant. Fulnecky has also appealed the decision, with her attorney indicating that she is considering all legal remedies, including appealing the university’s decision.

Will the student’s academic standing be affected by the incident?

The University of Oklahoma has stated that Samantha Fulnecky’s final grade will not be affected by the zero received on the essay, ensuring no academic harm to the student. The university emphasized its commitment to academic freedom and integrity, stating that the decision was made to ensure that students receive an education free from impermissible evaluative standards.