December 23, 2025

University of Oklahoma Addresses Religious Discrimination in Grading

News Summary

The University of Oklahoma has removed a graduate teaching assistant from instructional duties following an investigation into allegations of religious discrimination. The case arose after student Samantha Fulnecky received a zero on an essay referencing the Bible to discuss gender roles. An inquiry concluded that the instructor’s grading was arbitrary, prompting action to uphold academic integrity. This incident has sparked further discussions on academic freedom and the balance of diverse viewpoints in education.

Oklahoma city, OK – The University of Oklahoma is making headlines following the removal of a graduate teaching assistant from instructional duties, a move that underscores the institution’s commitment to academic integrity and the fair treatment of students. This decision comes in the wake of an investigation into allegations of religious discrimination stemming from a student’s zero grade on an essay that cited the Bible in discussing gender roles. The situation has ignited a broader conversation about academic freedom and the balance between diverse viewpoints in higher education.

Student Samantha Fulnecky received a failing grade on her essay in a “Lifespan Development” psychology course, which attempted to challenge current gender theories by referencing Biblical texts. The instructor, Mel Curth, deemed the submission inadequate, arguing it lacked empirical support and had offensive undertones. Following this, Fulnecky lodged a formal complaint asserting that her grade was influenced by her religious beliefs, prompting an administrative investigation by the university.

Upon reviewing the incident, including the instructor’s grading practices and statements made regarding the assignment, the University of Oklahoma concluded that Curth’s grading approach was arbitrary. As a result, Curth has been relieved of all instructional responsibilities, reinforcing the university’s dedication to an environment where students can express their viewpoints without fear of discrimination.

Background of the Incident

The controversial essay required students to respond to a research paper on gender typicality and mental health. Fulnecky’s position, which cited Biblical teachings, sparked contention, ultimately leading to Curth’s initial grading decision, which has now been deemed unfair. This event has positioned the university at the forefront of debates surrounding the intersection of religious expression and academic assessment.

Future of Academic Freedom at the University

The University of Oklahoma has reiterated its commitment to fostering an environment that encourages diverse opinions while maintaining a structure of academic rigor. The institution’s emphasis on teaching students how to think critically, rather than what to think, remains a cornerstone of its educational philosophy. This situation will likely prompt further examinations of grading standards and the ways instructors assess student work, ensuring fairness and objectivity in the classroom.

Implications for Students and Faculty

The removal of the graduate teaching assistant is expected to serve as a pivotal example for both students and faculty regarding the standards of instruction and evaluation in higher education. Faculty members are encouraged to continually reflect on their grading practices, ensuring they align with the university’s mission of teaching and mentorship free from introducing bias or personal beliefs into the grading process.

Broader Discussions on Academic Environment

The incident has led to wider discussions about academic freedom and the extent to which educational institutions should accommodate various viewpoints, particularly those grounded in religious beliefs. Stakeholders in Oklahoma’s higher education community are likely to engage in ongoing dialogues addressing the framework of classroom instruction and the principles of inclusivity and respect for differing opinions.

Conclusion: A Step Towards Fairness

Ultimately, the University of Oklahoma’s response to this incident reflects a proactive stance towards ensuring that personal beliefs, including religious views, do not hinder a student’s academic experience. As conversations around academic integrity and freedom continue to evolve, the university remains committed to fostering an educational environment where all students feel respected and valued. Engaged members of the community are encouraged to explore university programs and remain informed about the ongoing developments within Oklahoma’s colleges and universities.

Feature	Details
Student’s Name	Samantha Fulnecky
Instructor’s Name	Mel Curth
Course	Lifespan Development Psychology
Assignment	Essay on gender roles
Issue	Allegation of religious discrimination due to essay content referencing the Bible
University’s Action	Investigation concluded that grading was arbitrary; instructor removed from teaching duties
Broader Discussion	Academic freedom, religious expression, and classroom instruction boundaries

What led to the removal of the graduate teaching assistant?

The University of Oklahoma removed the graduate teaching assistant after an investigation into a student’s claim of religious discrimination. The student, Samantha Fulnecky, received a zero on a psychology essay that referenced the Bible to support her views on gender roles. The university determined that the instructor’s grading was arbitrary in this instance, leading to the decision to cease their teaching responsibilities.

What was the nature of the student’s essay?

The student’s essay cited the Bible to challenge the concept of multiple genders, which was the subject of the assignment in the psychology course.

What was the university’s response to the incident?

The University of Oklahoma placed the graduate teaching assistant on administrative leave during the investigation and concluded that the grading was arbitrary for this specific assignment. The instructor will no longer have instructional duties at the university. The university emphasized its commitment to academic freedom and integrity, stating that it is dedicated to teaching students how to think, not what to think, and will continue to review best practices to ensure instructors can objectively assess students’ work without compromising their ability to teach and inspire the next generation.

What are the broader implications of this case?

The incident has sparked broader discussions about academic freedom, religious expression, and the boundaries of classroom instruction. The university’s decision underscores its dedication to maintaining an environment free from discrimination and upholding fair grading practices.